Blog Comments

Kinetica Online is pleased to provide direct links to commentaries from our senior editor Dr. Steven Pelech has posted on other blogs sites. Most of these comments appear on the GenomeWeb Daily Scan website, which in turn highlight interesting blogs that have been posted at numerous sites in the blogosphere since the beginning of 2010. A wide variety of topical subjects are covered ranging from the latest scientific breakthroughs, research trends, politics and career advice. The original blogs and Dr. Pelech’s comments are summarized here under the title of the original blog. Should viewers wish to add to these discussions, they should add their comments at the original blog sites.

The views expressed by Dr. Pelech do not necessarily reflect those of the other management and staff at Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation. However, we wish to encourage healthy debate that might spur improvements in how biomedical research is supported and conducted.

Surrounded by Viruses

Submitted by S. Pelech - Kinexus on Thu, 09/05/2013 - 17:34
The estimation of at least 320,000 viruses that can affect mammals is simply based on the identification of 58 unique viruses in flying foxes multiplied by the number of known mammalian species, which was taken as 5,486. Simon Anthony and the other authors of the study acknowledge that this estimate assumes that all mammalian species are targeted by a similar number of viruses and that there is 100% host specificity. However, most viruses appear to be zoonotic and capable of infecting multiple species.

Using an N=1 with the Indian Flying Fox (Pteropus giganteus) as a typical representative of mammals in general is also somewhat tricky as these are extremely mobile and social creatures that reside in high density communities. In coming up with an estimation of viral diversity for a species, the best-studied mammals are actually humans, which admittedly are also atypical. Since 1901, at least 219 viruses have been identified that are capable of infecting humans, and this list has been growing by 3 to 4 new viruses each year (
http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1604/2864.full).
The ViralZone webpage (
http://viralzone.expasy.org/all_by_species/678.html) documents 124 pathogenic viruses that actually cause disease in humans. Of these, 74 (60%) are also found in other animal hosts including insects.

Using the average of the bat and human data, and a 40% host specificity value, the number of viruses than affect mammals can be calculated as equal to approximately 304,000 (=(219+58)/2 x 5,486 x 40%). This is very close to the estimate of at least 320,000 mammalian viruses offered by Simon Anthony and his colleagues at Columbia University.

The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses has catalogued a total of 2618 known viruses or viroids that either affect eukaryotes or prokaryotes in their latest list (
http://talk.ictvonline.org/files/ictv_documents/m/msl/4440.aspx). The most recent list of known viruses from the Wikipedia: WikiProject Viruses features 3443 distinct viruses (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_viruses). Present knowledge about even the existence of all of the viruses on our planet is evidently extremely limited. Nevertheless, it is remarkable that that only a very tiny subset of the world’s viruses actually cause disease in humans and other mammals. This is perhaps because as a phylum mammals have been around for a much shorter time (i.e. 200 million years) than other vertebrates (over 540 million years), and mammals only really flourished after the demise of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. Even today, mammals account for less than 0.1% of the biomass on our planet.

The ability of a virus to successfully infect a host requires co-evolution with the host species. Particularly virulent viruses that kill their hosts are not as effective in their propagation. More than half of the known viruses that infect humans cause disease, but the actual number of viruses that can stealthily replicate in humans without obvious evidence of morbidity may number in the multiples more. Future genomic sequencing of human fluid, stool and biopsy specimens will indubitably lead to the identification of much higher numbers of previously unknown human viruses.

On a related note, I notice that from one comment summary to another comment summary there are sometimes differences in the sizes of the text. For example, if you check the weblink:
http://www.kinexus.ca/kinetica/publications/blog-comments/files/archive-jul-2012.php you will see that the text size varies from paragraph to paragraph. Could we be more consistent about the font size - the larger font size of the two shown would be better?

Link to the original blog post